Wednesday, February 7, 2007

Take a guess...

QUICK!

Off the top of your head name three black models (NOT NAOMI, ALEK WEK, OR IMAN)in the current fashion scene signed to the top women agecies right here in New York. Bet you can't... Well me neither can I!

Out of curiousity, I went on their perspective websites, and guess what?, there aren't very many. This is quite sad, because beyond it being wrong on a social standpoint, aesthetically (even if on a superficial level) they have A LOT to bring to the table. This business is all about the aesthetics, so this doesn't make sense. Why does it continue to be ignored?

Here's lowly line up. (Sorry for the long post, but i've got a point to prove here, or atleast encourage some sort of discussion on this issue)

IMG's (1) single "sista" ALEK WEK


DNA: (1) OLUCHI


SUPREME: (0) aka none.

WOMEN: (0) nope. none here.

MARILYN: a whopping (3).

KIMANEE WILSON


EMANUELA DE PAULA


ANA BELA


FORD: didn't have a public book for their women's division, but hey, they've got
CHANEL IMAN which I adore. (I think I might have mentioned this once or twice...)


NEXT: (3)
AGBANI DAREGO


JASMIN BURGESS


SELENA AYALA


ELITE: (1)

DAMARIS LEWIS


TRUMP: Leading the pack at (4).

KIARA KABAKURU


KELLY GERVAIS


CASSIE LEWIS


CYNTHIA BAILEY


MAJOR:(1)


NY MODEL MANAGEMENT: (2 OUT OF 56)

NICOLE FISCELLA


NADINE WILLIS


Excuse the long post, but something's not right here. All of these agencies have hundreds of models on their women's boards, but the fact that I can list all the black ones on one post is insane!

Whats going on with the agencies in NY? Yes, I'll go "there". The Women's boards of many of the top agency and management companies are lacking diversity, and getting quite boring. Bookers- shake it up a bit! lets not be so predictable. How many blondes can you have on your boards?

Of course this is nothing new, but seriously... we can-and SHOULD do better than this.

People, people, people...we're being bamboozled.

No comments:

Post a Comment